Virtual Paradise Forum

I don't get it: the function is declared "function notification(sender, args)", but you call it from VP with "activate notify calculator"?

The most important issue for me would be the user friendliness. I don't have time to really test this version but in previous versions I noticed that some things didn't really work from the first time.

You should really focus on the way objects get edited. Object should get selected from the first ...

I think there are already multiple object models suported.

Your ideas look very cool. Primitive shapes are great and the FPS part also opens a whole new world of possibilities. If this is to be added there should also be a World setting, zone option and bot command to force users into this mode.

Perhaps you could build in a possibility to toggle Object selection on/off. That way the builder/caretaker can experience the world from the view of the people who don't have that rights.

The same can be done with flying and pass-thru. In AW you'd have to login on privileges without rights to view ...

Nice work, downloading now.

The object properties look like VS200*

Edwin wrote:...
I now also use the bot SDK internally, this also has the advantage that the bot SDK will always be up-to-date.

Lol, sounds good to me.

I'm now using Windows Vista and I already tested VP and worked perfect.

by Tqrules on Sat Feb 23, 2008 12:10 am

Nicely done edwin iam verry excited on how vp is being developed

keep it up hurd you have rendering power that exceeds aw 4.1 ^^ good stuff


with kind regards

i dont think it exceeds Activeworlds but it is still very good

Edwin rocks , sorry i aint ...

Ah yes, I see it now.

But could you perhaps make the Instance an optional parameter so if you don't specify it, it just takes a default instance?
Sorry, no. C doesn't do optional arguments and the instance is always the first parameter so that wouldn't work anyway.

We'll just get used to it, I ...

Ah yes, I see it now.

But could you perhaps make the Instance an optional parameter so if you don't specify it, it just takes a default instance?

You can switch instances in AW to. I never really used that but you have aw_instance_set

Looks nice, but it would be even more cool if the vp sdk could work exactly the same as the aw_version so we can easily convert existing bots.
The C API is like that, the wrapper isn't. But do you really like that better? I think this fits C# and .Net much better.

For .NET it's oké, there are ...

Looks nice, but it would be even more cool if the vp sdk could work exactly the same as the aw_version so we can easily convert existing bots.

cube3 wrote:Who said anything about VS2005 or VS2008 ?

I assumed you said .NET (so the 2005 and 2008 version of VB, VC#, VC++) were o.k.

I like the way Visual Studio works so I always use Visual C++, Visual Basic etc.